Clontarf-based fossil fuel company feels the heat from XR

By Angela Deegan, Extinction Rebellion

In May this year, a short article in the business pages of the Irish Independent caught my attention. The article titled “Clontarf Energy acquires 10pc stake in Western Australian gas prospect” dispassionately stated that the British-registered, Irish-based oil and gas explorer had “acquired 10pc of an offshore gas prospect in Western Australia for $4m (€3.8m)” and that drilling was expected to start drilling in June. Nothing exciting to see here. Just another company selling out our future for the chance at some big profits! 

It struck me how this company was “hiding in plain sight” in a Dublin suburb while engaging in fossil fuel operations halfway across the world! I was outraged and motivated to take action with Extinction Rebellion (XR) - which we would do over the following months, with some surprises along the way. 

The first step was sending a letter from XR to the company asking for a meeting to discuss the imperative of changing their business model away from fossil fuel investments. The letter elicited a quick, defensive response - but one that failed to respond in any way to the request for a meeting. So we formed a group within XR to brainstorm ideas. The group included people brand new to XR - Eoin Galavan, a psychologist living in Howth and Diarmaid Lawlor, a legal office assistant living in North County Dublin. 

Clontarf Energy Plc (CE) headquarters are in an unassuming two-storey seafront building at 162 Clontarf Road, Clontarf, Dublin. It actually houses multiple companies, including those of the “162 Group” - with many of the same directors in common. The focus of the 162 Group is “high potential natural resource start-ups. The principal is to marry geological risk against political uncertainty.” 

CE has investments in oil & gas exploration in Chad, Ghana and, most recently, off the coast of Western Australia. The company’s interim statement for the period ended June 2022 states “Shortages of piped gas and LNG feedstock have driven prices to record levels. There has rarely been a better time to hold prospective acreage.” It’s clear that this company can’t see past potential profits to the havoc and suffering that greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels are unleashing on our climate - just this year devastating droughts in China & Europe; wildfires in Spain, Portugal and France; flooding in Pakistan; drought leading to starvation in the Horn of Africa, etc.

On 28th July, holding a big red “Stop Fossil Fuels banner”, we marched along the seafront to 162 Clontarf Road, where XR rebel Jeffrey Sardina proceeded to the front door with our letter repeating our demand for a meeting. To our surprise, two of the three directors of the company - David Horgan, Chairman and Jim Finn - were there and invited us in. (It turns out they had been tipped off the previous day by the Press about our plans.)

They met with Jeffrey and me while the rest of the group protested outside. We told the Directors about the devastation that fossil fuels are causing and about the climate anxiety that we feel and that we regularly hear expressed by friends, acquaintances and members of the public. We told them they had to get out of fossil fuel exploration and asked them to do some soul-searching about the evil that is fossil fuel exploration in an age when we understand so well the destruction these fuels are causing. When we weren’t getting anywhere, we asked to bring a climate scientist with us for a follow-up meeting and they agreed to a 12th September meeting.

In doing outreach to the public at Vernon Ave, Clontarf after the meeting, we found most people had no idea that there was a fossil fuel company just up the road from them and were supportive and appreciative of what we were doing.

In the intervening weeks, we had new members join our XR group - including Tom Adams, a student counsellor at TUD, and Enda Kelly, a student living in Carlow. One of our group members alerted us that Horgan was a signatory to the ‘There is no Climate Emergency declaration’ on Clintel.org, a project by a lobby group funded by two Dutch millionaires. We also observed that Horgan was regularly being interviewed on several Irish radio stations - RTÉ, Newstalk, Radio Nova and Today FM. It’s outrageous that radio stations give this man a platform that lends him credibility while he draws from the climate denier playbook. So we started a petition on Uplift.ie, calling on these radio stations to stop giving airtime to climate deniers like Horgan and instead ramp up coverage of the climate crisis and climate solutions. 

A week before the scheduled September 12th meeting, word came from Horgan that he wouldn’t be available for the meeting as he was travelling to Bolivia on business - despite the date for the meeting having been set to suit CE. He was obviously thumbing his nose at us. We went ahead with preparing for the meeting nonetheless, including public outreach in Clontarf and neighbouring Fairview in the week prior to it. On 12th September, we showed up at the appointed time. Climate Advisor and Sustainable Human Development Scientist and XR rebel, Naomi Sheehan, came with us. CE director Jim Finn came to the door, but he claimed that the meeting had been cancelled by Horgan. It was clear he didn’t want to meet with any of us. However, he finally agreed to meet with Naomi alone. 

Naomi focused largely on the business, financial and humanitarian risks of the climate emergency. She emphasised to Mr Finn that our current fossil-fuel based course is leading us on a pathway to human extinction, with 39 countries worldwide on the brink of famine and hunger projected to increase 6-fold to 840 million people by 2030; that economically, the losses from climate change globally by 2050 would be equivalent to 3 or 4 back-to-back Covid size pandemics, torpedoing the global economy like no event ever before; that CE’s office and many thousands of homes could be under sea level within 20 years and that upset homeowners would be demanding compensation from those responsible for this catastrophe - such as fossil fuel executives and politicians. This seemed to register with Finn.

She reminded him that every fraction of a degree of warming counts, and that misinformation and climate denial were enabling the continuation of inaction. Finn seemed surprised to learn that his co-director Horgan was a signatory of the ‘There is No Climate Emergency’ declaration and said it would be ‘silly’ to deny climate change. Despite that, he still insisted that the company needed to continue their fossil fuel investments for about ten years - while they awaited their investments in lithium mining in Bolivia turning a profit! He also posed the “why us” question - i.e. why don’t you pick some of the bigger fossil fuel players? Of course, that’s what all fossil fuel companies want - to be left alone to make their profits, however devastating the costs to others.

While Naomi and Mr Finn talked, the rest of us rebels protested outside on both sides of Clontarf Road with banners with the slogans ‘Stop Fossil Fuels’ and ‘Burning us Alive’. One of our group - Seán Loughran from Balgriffin - had arrived early and written “Clontarf Energy Are Responsible For Rising Seas” in huge chalk lettering on the footpath outside the offices - before cycling off to work. Some members of the general public and a local Green Party councillor, Donna Cooney, stopped by to support the protest. The action made ‘Irish Times Photo of the Day’ with a little help from Councillor Cooney’s dog. 

After the protest, XR protestor Suzanne Brewer, a teacher from Raheny, witnessed the chalk artwork being washed off the footpath by a contractor who had apparently just been waiting in the wings for us to leave. Presumably the truth in the chalk messages made CE uncomfortable. 

After two meetings/protests with CE, we hope we have opened a chink in their armour. What we know for certain is we have raised awareness about the existence of this fossil fuel company among their Clontarf neighbours. This XR group’s focus now is on getting more signups to the petition asking Irish radio stations to stop giving a platform to climate deniers - like Horgan - who have a vested interest in the promotion of fossil fuels. When we have enough signatures, we will approach the radio stations with the petitions in hand to engage in discussion about the importance of giving climate science and policy experts airtime - not climate deniers with self-serving motives - and getting some real commitments from them on this front. 

Please help us meet/exceed our goal of 1,000 signatures on the petition. Sign it, if you haven’t already done so - and if you have, think of at least two others you can ask! And get involved in climate action yourself - if not with XR, then with one of the many other excellent groups out there. Remember, the greatest threat in the overarching climate and biodiversity crises we’re in now is the belief that someone else will fix them!

Photos of the Sept 12th Protest 

By Art Ó Laoghaire

Photos of the Sept 12th Protest 

By Art Ó Laoghaire

Photos of the Sept 12th Protest 

By Art Ó Laoghaire

By Angela Deegan


Why we need green hydrogen - but beware of the greenwash!

Written by Elaine Baker

Why do we need to store energy?

Switching from fossil fuels to renewables is essential for de-carbonisation.  For most renewables, such as wind and solar, we can’t turn them up and down according to our needs.  This is a key argument used by the fossil fuel lobby against renewables – the fossil fuel lobby try to persuade us that we still need fossil fuels for when the wind is not blowing or the sun is not shining.  However, to eliminate fossil fuels, what we actually need are ways of storing energy when the wind is blowing and the sun is shining, for use when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining.   This is energy storage.

What are the different types of energy storage?

The most promising technologies for energy storage are batteries, green hydrogen, and pumped water (like Turlough Hill).  Each of these have different advantages and disadvantages, so we probably need a combination of them.  Some of them are more suitable for short term storage (e.g. storing some energy daily for use during the early evening peak) and others are more suitable for long term storage (e.g. storing energy annually for use during the winter peak).

What are the pros and cons of green hydrogen relative to other energy storage?

Green hydrogen vs batteries: Hydrogen storage infrastructure lasts a long time whereas batteries wear out quickly, green hydrogen is more suitable than batteries for storing large quantities of energy for months, and currently there are human rights and local environmental issues around extractive mining for several battery minerals.   

Green hydrogen vs pumped water: Green hydrogen storage can be built in many places, whereas pumped water storage can only be done in places with certain topology, and can also have negative local environmental effects.

However, when converting electricity to green hydrogen, a lot more energy is lost in the process relative to batteries or pumped storage.  So each is suitable in different circumstances. Some of the problems with batteries can be reduced by better policy, recycling and technology, but green hydrogen is an important option, particularly for months-at-a-time storage.

Beware of the greenwash!

While green hydrogen energy storage is likely to be a very important piece of the de-carbonisation puzzle, there is a lot of greenwash to look out for!

-       No to grey hydrogen! Hydrogen can also be produced from fossil fuels directly, or can be produced from electricity where the electricity has been produced from fossil fuels (even worse, as even more carbon emissions involved).  Hydrogen produced using fossil fuels is called grey hydrogen.  We need to produce hydrogen only at times when there is a surplus of renewables on the electricity grid – this is green hydrogen.

-        No to blue hydrogen! The fossil fuel lobby try to get around this by saying they can capture the carbon and store it while they are producing hydrogen from fossil fuels.  They call this blue hydrogen.  We need to not emit carbon in the first place, not emit it and then use up lots of energy trying to capture it again!  The best  carbon capture technology by far is provided by nature - the tree and other natural carbon sinks.  Artificial carbon capture and storage (CSS) technologies do not make any sense.

-        No to new gas pipelines! The fossil gas industry argues in favour of investment in new fossil gas pipelines because they say they can also be used to transport hydrogen.  We need to be very careful about this – most gas pipelines can only be used for hydrogen if the hydrogen is mixed with a lot of fossil gas!  Also, it is a lot quicker and more efficient to transport energy by sending electricity via cables than by sending hydrogen via pipelines.

-        Beware of “We will convert fossil gas generators to hydrogen generators later” – It may be possible to convert existing fossil gas electricity generators into hydrogen electricity generators, but we have to be really careful not to allow this to justify new fossil gas generator investment that turns out to be costly or difficult to convert – this can be a back door to fossil fuel lock-in.

Hydrogen has a lot of potential to support de-carbonisation, but also can be used by the fossil fuel lobby to greenwash fossil fuels – let’s support the move towards genuinely green hydrogen and not be tricked by the greenwash!

Full and Final Ban on Petroleum Licencing Now!

Extinction Rebellion held a demonstration outside Sinn Féin’s headquarters in Dublin this afternoon, at 12pm Wednesday the 8th of December. This was to “highlight Sinn Féin’s lack of timely action to prevent oil exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in Northern Ireland”.

The DUP Minister of Economy, Gordon Lyons, is currently reviewing Petroleum Licensing Policy and intends to introduce petroleum licensing policy options into Northern Ireland Executive before Christmas. Extinction Rebellion spokesperson, Oscar Mooney, said that the activist group “calls on Sinn Féin to act now in the Northern Irish Executive to ensure a full and final ban on petroleum licensing.”

A full ban on fracking is currently a stated policy of Sinn Féin. The two fracking applications currently being lodged would allow drilling and fracking to occur at two locations in Northern Ireland, in County Fermanagh and at Lough Neagh.

In 2019, Sinn Féin issued their Climate Minority Report in which they recommend “an all-Ireland approach to climate action”, as well as more ambitious targets on renewable energy generation. While fracking is currently banned in the Republic of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and England, there is no ban in place in Northern Ireland.

Sinn Féin put forward a bill the Northern Assembly to ban fracking. In the bill, an earlier term “all rocks” was replaced by “shale or encased in shale”. According to Extinction Rebellion, this would “leave Northern Ireland open for fracking in sandstone and coal bed methane”. It is currently considered unlikely for the bill to pass before the Northern Ireland election in Spring 2022.

Fracking results in the release of greenhouse gases and other dangerous pollutants including methane into the local air and water systems. Methane has a global warming potential 84 times greater than that of carbon dioxide. Fracking can also cause the release of contaminants into nearby ecosystems, which can travel through hydraulically connected systems, such as rivers or aquifers, and other connected natural systems. The carcinogens in the air  produced from fracking can travel up to 100 miles putting the people in the Republic at risk from health harms of fracking in Northern Ireland. 

A recent publication by the Irish Centre for Human Rights found that fracking is in violation of the right to life, right to water, right to health, right to housing, and the right to a safe, clean, environment amongst many other rights. The community around Lough Neagh including the people living in Belfast rely heavily on the lough, using it for 40% of their drinking water, and any contamination would lead to dangerous chemicals entering their water source.

Tom White from Belcoo Frack Free stated that “once drilling starts, contamination will be a very real health risk to the locals,” and asked if “Sinn Féin [is] going to fail to defend Human Rights?”

Sinn Féin has previously been vocal about banning fracking across the Island, as demonstrated in their policy documents and election manifestos.

The activist groups call on Sinn Féin to “work with other parties UUP and Alliance and form a policy that will ban licenses.” Dianne Little from LAMP Fermanagh said that “if fracking is allowed to occur in Northern Ireland, the price will be illness, real pain, and suffering to people on both sides of the border in Ireland and in communities most vulnerable to climate change impacts.”

De-carbonize the internet

Think global, act local

Think global, act local

Written by Elaine Baker

Extinction Rebellion has recently been taking action to halt the huge new fossil-fuel guzzling data centres which are being proposed in Ireland. Data centres consume a lot of energy. For example, the proposed data centre in Ennis would have a 200 MW load - equivalent to the electricity consumption of approximately 210,000 homes, which is the number of homes in Clare, Limerick and Kerry combined [1].  

However, data centres make the internet work. So how are data centres and fossil fuels linked, and how can the internet be decarbonised? We need to call for real internet decarbonisation and not be trapped by greenwash smoke-and-mirrors mechanisms such as “Guarantees of Origin”.

There are two big issues in electricity decarbonisation: increasing the quantity of renewables, and managing timing and energy storage.

Quantity of renewable supply: we need a lot more renewable generation on the grid, to cater for existing electricity needs, to enable transfer of heating and transport from fossil fuel to decarbonised electricity, while ensuring that essential needs and the most vulnerable are prioritised in a just transition, and using the electricity we have more efficiently.

Storage and timing: many renewables, such as wind and solar, cannot be timed or turned up and down at will. To avoid using fossil fuels as backup when there is low wind and sun, and to avoid wasting renewable energy when there is surplus supply from wind and sun, we need to use more when it is available and use less when it is not, and we need to store renewable energy when it is available, for use when it is not.

Current data centre plans = more fossil fuel generation.  Many current data centre plans, including the Ennis plan, involve either the data centre installing it’s own large-scale fossil fuel generation, or the grid being forced to procure fossil fuel generation to keep up with the data centre’s demand whenever it wants it.  The Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU) recently issued a consultation paper recommending that data centres be obliged to adhere to “connection measures” to be flexible in their timing of use of grid electricity, but the paper fails to clearly distinguish between a) flexibility through storage, b) flexibility through matching real time electricity usage to the timing of the wind and sun, and c) flexibility through private data-centre operated fossil fuel generation. The first two can be compatible with decarbonisation, the last is not. 

The greenwash trap. We need to be careful of data centres (and other businesses) claiming they are 100% renewable because they have purchased “guarantees of origin”. These are credits from renewable suppliers which are not even connected to the electricity grid the data centre is connected to, and which are not producing electricity at the time it is being used by the data centre. This is smoke-and-mirrors greenwash and doesn't do anything to prevent the Irish grid using fossil fuels. Instead, we need to focus on the "carbon intensity" of the grid they are using (the Irish grid), at the time they are using it. Carbon intensity means grams of CO2 equivalent emitted per kWh of electricity produced, and it can vary substantially according to the wind. Data centres should be required to use or store electricity when the carbon intensity is low, and not draw from the grid at all when there is a shortage of renewables like wind or solar.

Demands to data centres: Examples of pre-conditions which could be set out for new data centre proposals include:

  • No new fossil fuel burning infrastructure should be installed to power the data centre, either on or off site, either owned and operated by the data centre owner/operator or otherwise

  • The data centre should be required to invest in renewable energy generation on-site, or close by on the grid it is connected to (ie the Irish grid)

  • The data centre should be required to consume grid electricity only at times when there is surplus wind or other renewable energy on the grid. They may install batteries or other energy storage infrastructure to facilitate this. This should be linked to real-time carbon intensity of the grid, not "Guarantees of Origin" or other ineffective mechanisms.

Think global, act local: At a global level, data centres need to be located in places where they can be powered by 100% renewables, either real time or stored. Only then will we have a de-carbonised internet. We need a “Not here, not anywhere” approach to blocking development of fossil-fueled data centres, acting in solidarity with others taking action on this issue around the world.

[1] Analysis of Ennis Data Centre planning application by Futureproof Clare, Extinction Rebellion Clare and Clare Environmental Network, August 2021

[2 ] Commission for Regulation of Utilities https://www.cru.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CRU21060-CRU-consultation-on-Data-Centre-measures.pdf June 2021

[3] Eirgrid http://smartgriddashboard.eirgrid.com/