Fossil F. Infrastructure

ACTIVISTS USE DUBLIN-NY PORTAL TO CREATIVELY HIGHLIGHT THREAT OF LNG

24th August 2024, 5pm, Dublin Extinction Rebellion Ireland (XRI) staged a coordinated  international anti-LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas), anti-fracking protest today at the Dublin - New York Portal with activists from Sane Energy, New York. Irish protesters chanted “from Dublin to NYC, we say no to LNG” and “New Fortress Energy, we don't want your LNG”. Both sides communicated with each via hand signals and shared sound files. On the New York side, activists displayed banners opposing fracking and other banners highlighting their ongoing fight against an LNG storage facility in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Protestors on the Irish side symbolically shut down a “gas pipeline”.

US groups have been vocal in their support of the Irish anti-LNG campaign, and actor Mark Ruffalo has regularly stepped in to urge the Irish government to ban LNG. In June he said on twitter:

greenparty_ie should not break its promise & move forward w/ gov’t funded LNG import terminal. The US gov’t has a ban on LNG export permits while it assesses the national security & climate risks. Why isn’t Ireland doing the same?”

Today's action was in response to pre-application talks between American Company New Fortress Energy and An Bord Pleanála regarding a planning application for a Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) off the coast of Ireland - following the rejection of the company’s previous application last September and the Energy Security Review report last November recommending a “temporary” LNG import terminal as a gas reserve. Fracking was banned in Ireland in 2017 but is still commonly used to extract gas and oil in the USA. 

Ian Mac an Ghaill, XRI rebel and teacher, said:

“This action highlights the shared grievances of anti-fracking, anti-LNG activists from across both sides of the Atlantic and the madness of considering Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) storage as an energy security solution, when the overarching threat to a secure future is the climate crisisMethane leakage and energy-intensive processing means that LNG is more polluting for the climate than coal. Bringing LNG fossil fuel infrastructure to Ireland for the first time risks locking us into highly polluting dirty energy for decades to come. We need a cleaner, brighter, gas-free future.”

Priscilla Grim from Sane Energy New York said:

We gather here today to connect New York City to Dublin in the inspiring spirit of the Portal project. We stand united with our friends across the Atlantic who also oppose toxic LNG projects on their shores. Known data on LNG pipelines reveals that in the average year there are nearly 6,000 pipeline explosions, fires and leaks, causing 300 deaths and over 1,000 injuries in the US. We say no to this toxic substance in our communities.”

Thomas Morelli, XRI Arts Coordinator said: 

"The government must reject the Energy Security Package 2030 recommendation to build a state-led LNG terminal. They must introduce a policy to unconditionally ban all LNG terminals, in line with the May 2021 policy statement on the importation of fracked gas, and in line with the Programme for Government."

Photo by M Sedlmayr

Photo by M Sedlmayr

Photo by M Sedlmayr

Photo by K Handy

Photo by M Sedlmayr

EXTINCTION REBELLION ACTIVISTS CALL FOR EMERGENCY MEETING WITH MINISTER EAMON RYAN TO DISCUSS RULING OUT LNG IMPORTS

Dublin, 16th November 2023: Following their protest outside his department offices this morning and brief interaction with his private secretary, Extinction Rebellion Ireland contacted the Minister, repeating their demand for an emergency meeting with him to discuss why it’s critical to rule out LNG imports.

The text of the email was as follows:

“Dear Minister Ryan,

This morning, Extinction Rebellion Ireland expressed our outrage at the stance you adopted this week, as Minister for Environment, Climate and Communications, in recommending a Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) as an energy security solution. We know that an FSRU means LNG imports. In a hastily convened protest, we highlighted the dangers of LNG by staging, outside your offices at DECC, an “LNG tanker” leaking “methane”. 

In the last election, the Green Party campaigned against the importation of LNG. That stance was included in the Programme For Government as a ban on the import of fracked gas - which effectively rules out LNG imports - because it’s entirely unfeasible to verify that any LNG imported is from gas that was produced without fracking. With 12 months at most left in Government, if breaking with Government partners on this issue means the collapse of Government, that is a sacrifice worth making. This issue is too major to compromise on. Too much depends on it.

Ireland’s addiction to fossil fuels must end. There can be no new fossil fuel infrastructure. Fossil fuels are destabilizing our climate. LNG is just as bad in terms of greenhouse gas emissions as coal (and by some reports, worse). Scientists are screaming at us to slash emissions. You must heed them and not lead us down a path of destruction. 

The most important duty of your Ministerial position is to safeguard the future of the people of Ireland. There is little you can achieve between now and the next election that could be as impactful as heading off the threat of LNG imports. We consider this issue to be urgent and we formally now ask you for an emergency meeting with us by mid-December, to discuss with you why it is critical to rule out LNG imports.

We look forward to hearing back from you.

Love and rage,

Angela Deegan and Nathan Edgar Hutchinson

Activists with Extinction Rebellion Ireland”

Extinction Rebellion Ireland will continue to put pressure on the Minister if he refuses to meet with us. 

- END - 


Extinction Rebellion Ireland rebels stage sit-in at DECC Offices and “LNG tanker” leak in Reaction to Eamon Ryan’s LNG announcement

DECC offices, Dublin 2, 9am Thursday 16th November 2023: Extinction Rebellion Ireland (XRI) activists began a sit-in this morning of the offices of the Dept of Environment, Climate and Communications (DECC) in protest of the Minister’s recommendation of a floating LNG terminal option as energy security solution in the report Energy Security In Ireland to 2030 published by DECC on Wednesday. Meanwhile, outside the offices, activists from XRI and other groups, including Fingal One Future, protested and staged a leak in a tank on board an 18-foot-long “LNG Tanker”. 

The occupiers demanded a meeting with the Minister to insist that he honour the Green Party’s commitment in the Programme For Government to ban imports of fracked gas - a commitment which effectively rules out LNG imports. 

Angela Deegan, one of the XRI activists occupiers said:

“It is outrageous to consider LNG storage as an energy security solution when the overarching threat to a secure future is the climate crisis - a crisis driven primarily by the emission of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels like LNG - plus the fact that LNG facilities are so vulnerable to terrorist attack, not to mention the potential devastation to any surrounding communities in the event of an accident at an LNG facility.”

Seán Loughran of Fingal One Future said ,

“True energy security in this country means renewable energy, demand management and demand reduction. And that means a moratorium on data centres which are a threat to our energy supply and climate targets.”

Liquefied Natural Gas is “natural gas” that has been compressed to liquid form by cooling it to around −162 °C to enable its transport by tanker to markets where it can be re-gasified for distribution. The additional energy required to process LNG and the high levels of methane leakage in all stages of its supply chain make it 20% more GHG emissions-intensive than short-distance gas - no better than coal or oil in terms of its emissions in fact. 

Sinéad Sheehan of Futureproof Clare said,

"Futureproof Clare is supportive of the occupation of the DECC because the government body had failed miserably to do its job. Green Party Minister Eamon Ryan had a chance to do the right thing and prevent fracked gas from entering Ireland for good. It is on Minister Ryan's watch that the government has now advocated for a floating LNG terminal and we won't stand for it". 

Commenting on Minister Ryan’s decision Johnny McElligott, of Saftey Before LNG, Kerry said,

"It's a strange world when so-called Green politicians can move from a ban on LNG terminals importing fracked gas, to a ban only on commercial LNG, to now supporting the construction of a "non-commercial commercial LNG terminal" with a public-private partnership where LNG will have to be traded and replenished regularly due to evaporation. They are paying more attention to word games and increasing gas demand at a runaway pace for data centres than their pre-election promise of no new large-scale fossil fuel infrastructure”.

Aside from its terrible lifecycle emissions, LNG is also a highly unstable and explosive substance. If it spills, it can turn into rapidly expanding clouds of vapour capable of flash-freezing human flesh. LNG vapours can become uncontrollable fires that are so hot that they can burn people up to a mile away

At the May 30th Oireachtas Committee on Environment and Climate Action on “Liquefied Natural Gas and Oil Prospecting”, expert witness Professor Barry McMullin, Faculty of Engineering and Computing at Dublin City University, stated,

“In terms of geopolitical risk, any geopolitical actor that has both the means and interest in attacking the gas connection infrastructure between Ireland and the UK, by definition, has the means and interest to attack LNG import infrastructure. Therefore, LNG import infrastructure does not actually mitigate that geopolitical risk.”

LNG terminals have been identified by the United States Congressional Research Service as a potential terrorist target: "Because LNG infrastructure is highly visible and easily identified, it can be vulnerable to terrorist attack." The report continues, "LNG tankers and land-based facilities may be vulnerable to terrorism. Tankers could be physically attacked to destroy their cargo—or commandeered for use as weapons against coastal targets. Land-based LNG facilities could also be physically attacked with explosives or through other means. Alternatively, computer control systems could be “cyber-attacked,” or both physical and cyber attack could happen at the same time."

- END -